[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: LMDB file size, again
- To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>, "OpenLDAP, Technical" <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
- Subject: Re: LMDB file size, again
- From: Christian Sell <christian@gsvitec.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:13:03 +0100 (CET)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1447427583; l=425; s=domk; d=gsvitec.com; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:To:Reply-To:From:Date; bh=FAprS1O5tKXKNsfZx/PDRy0PFwHgby753LwTwfzerHM=; b=vS+RElFU1j03ceu4g+tAa537QTAkyVW0OWQeMEQmBNCqrbqR3AT6Ykes1FQK1trS+/+ vbHOcNDR+D6lb6oDUUleGdZKG2xnBk3uBE6yYcnKbpkrTAeDOcFWNv3AsIO3dAdM1Qtpm aZ3wXgZt0F3w5ABajzGxhffFrbyhWhXg7Z4=
- Importance: Medium
- In-reply-to: <5645EA16.6000201@symas.com>
- References: <58074298.1083910.1447266044431.JavaMail.open-xchange@omgreatgod.store> <5643B86D.2050906@symas.com> <1150425436.1142655.1447282266961.JavaMail.open-xchange@patina.store> <5645EA16.6000201@symas.com>
> Windows and its lack of reasonable sparse file support makes it not a suitable
> OS. (Windows supports sparse files, but not by default, and there is a 30%
> performance degradation when using that support in LMDB.)
I wouldn't mind a 30% degradation, really. Do you see a possibility of
supporting sparse files under Windows? Is there more to it than adding a
FSCTL_SET_SPARSE flag somewhere?
thanks,
Christian