Re: DB question

["Alex Zakharov" <alexzakharov@hotmail.com>]

I agree, the report is rather vague (to put it mildly) on the details of the 
actual testing routines/configuration/data and consequently can not be 
treated as a serious evaluation of the products, however it might be in the 
general ballpark.

Interestingly, they didn't include IBM's DB-2 based LDAP which sounds rather 
promising actually. There is a rather nice white paper on it on IBM's 
website. Unfortunately, it runs on Solaris/NT/AIX  only.


> From: Julio Sánchez Fernández <j_sanchez@stl.es>
> To: Alex Zakharov <alexzakharov@hotmail.com>
> CC: mikael.pettersson@framfab.se, openldap-general@OpenLDAP.org
> Subject: Re: DB question
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 17:51:26 +0200
>
>
>
> Alex Zakharov wrote:
> >
> > for what it is worth there is a series of articles on LDAP/LDAP servers
> > comparison in the latest network world.
> >
> > http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2000/0515rev2.html
>
> Ouch, that hurts...
>
> Not that we are in the business of beating iPlanet, but it would be
> useful to know their configuration and test data.  Otherwise, the
> results are rather meaningless.
>
> OpenLDAP can really get improvements in a lot of areas and performance
> is one of them.  But it would be helpful to know how it performed
> that badly.
>
> Julio

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com