RE: Getting around the single-threaded syncrepl model?

["Bannister, Mark" <Mark.Bannister@morganstanley.com>]

> > We have an aggressive target to meet - updates out in 5 minutes.  
> > Updates are small, but alarm bells are now ringing in my head about 
> > OpenLDAP's ability to deliver this.
> 
> This doesn't address the rest of your question, but if you need quick updates, you should be using
> delta-syncrepl rather than syncrepl for its smaller change footprint.  It's also been substantially
> more reliable than syncrepl in my experience.
> 
> --Quanah

Thanks Quanah, but I don't see how that addresses any of my questions.  We don't need delta-syncrepl
because we are not changing individual attributes.  We typically add or delete entire objects.

Mark.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE: Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. If you have received this communication in error, please destroy all electronic and paper copies; do not disclose, use or act upon the information; and notify the sender immediately. Mistransmission is not intended to waive confidentiality or privilege. Morgan Stanley reserves the right, to the extent permitted under applicable law, to monitor electronic communications. This message is subject to terms available at the following link: http://www.morganstanley.com/disclaimers. If you cannot access these links, please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. By messaging with Morgan Stanley you consent to the foregoing.