Re: Missing Syntax description in the cn=subschema's LDAPSyntaxes AT

To: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Missing Syntax description in the cn=subschema's LDAPSyntaxes AT
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:27:21 +0100
Cc: openldap-technical@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <353C5811-668B-46FB-BCCC-56B4A119A63B@OpenLDAP.org>
References: <4F3A3F87.60004@gmail.com> <4F3A516F.2010401@stroeder.com> <4F3A5B92.2000200@gmail.com> <353C5811-668B-46FB-BCCC-56B4A119A63B@OpenLDAP.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Firefox/10.0 SeaMonkey/2.7

Kurt Zeilenga wrote:

Generally speaking, if it's missing, it's missing for a reason...


Well, regarding OpenLDAP e.g. the .666 OID as a reason is debatable...

Ciao, Michael.

References:
- Missing Syntax description in the cn=subschema's LDAPSyntaxes AT
  - From: Emmanuel LÃcharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
- Re: Missing Syntax description in the cn=subschema's LDAPSyntaxes AT
  - From: Michael StrÃder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: Missing Syntax description in the cn=subschema's LDAPSyntaxes AT
  - From: Emmanuel LÃcharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
- Re: Missing Syntax description in the cn=subschema's LDAPSyntaxes AT
  - From: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>