[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Missing Syntax description in the cn=subschema's LDAPSyntaxes AT
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Missing Syntax description in the cn=subschema's LDAPSyntaxes AT
- From: Emmanuel LÃcharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:03:35 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QSw7e1zJ+rzLuEFz/SnN0Mp4iuhNAznb9jBBVERNK+A=; b=alV1VM4DkB3rusqA60X3NJwH1/krR0ndSLptstM3QLH1BvHNv63LwRlCyfIqZi0XtB k8BBN5+Smuy8IhLhNvQ4otXgKsVvmAFs/9WxJLSG/e/PbbOgsrsaIsrYPyINqb6maqo1 AEEfz3RBLpFC2rJM4CzTG3Vgg0zlBwQylfl1k=
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1
Hi guys,
the following Syntax are missing in the cn=subschema LDAPSyntaxes list,
while those syntaxes are refered by many ATs :
AttributeTypeDescription
DataQualitySyntax
DSAQualitySyntax
EnhancedGuide
Fax
Guide
LdapSyntaxDescription
MatchingRuleDescription
MatchingRuleUse Description
ObjectClassDescription
PresentationAddress
ProtocolInformation
TeletexTerminalInformation
I guess that the server does not care too much as most of those Syntax
(and associated AT) are not manipulated frequently by users, and the
server might have a default handling of AT without syntax. In Apache
Directory Studio and the Java LDAP API, it's a bit more annoying, as we
try to load the full schema from the server to locally check that values
are correct before sending them back to the server. We have a mechanism
to 'bypass' the missing syntaxes, of course, but I think that from a
completness POV, it would be better if OpenLDAP add those missing
syntaxes...
Does it deserver an ITS ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel LÃcharny
www.iktek.com