[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:41:41 +0200
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <F8170C99AD3949F0E9B52727@[192.168.1.2]>
References: <4DB781A9.5000905@lundman.net> <9673A50330C295D83E702340@[192.168.1.2]> <4DB787AB.9020703@lundman.net> <F8170C99AD3949F0E9B52727@[192.168.1.2]>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110416 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> From what I see on the list, people who use normal syncrepl
> do not have reliable replication.

Frankly this sounds scary!
Especially since you have more knowledge of the internals here... :-/

> With delta-syncrepl, the changes are read directly out of a changes
> database, in order.  The gains are significant.

IIRC with delta-syncrepl all write operations are serialized. Yes?

Ciao, Michael.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
  - From: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
- Re: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
  - From: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
- Re: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Robustness of replication
Next by Date: Re: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread