[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Robustness of replication

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: Robustness of replication
From: Michael StrÃder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:37:51 +0200
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <826E445A843B796627295EC9@[192.168.1.2]>
References: <4DB781A9.5000905@lundman.net> <9673A50330C295D83E702340@[192.168.1.2]> <4DB7C2A9.2010203@stroeder.com> <826E445A843B796627295EC9@[192.168.1.2]>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110416 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, April 27, 2011 9:15 AM +0200 Michael StrÃder
> <michael@stroeder.com> wrote:
> 
>> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>>> My only comment would be, if you want reliable replication, use
>>> delta-syncrepl.
>>
>> This really strikes me.
>>
>> 1. CHANGES contains a lot of references to fixes made to syncrepl and
>> delta-syncrepl. And it seems not every issue is resolved yet.
> 
> delta-syncrepl has been very solid for me, with the exception of the
> occasional edge case.  The last time there was an edge case encountered
> was with 2.4.22 (4/24/2010).

Are you running with slapo-memberof?
(see also ITS#6915 since delta-syncrepl needs slapo-accesslog)

Ciao, Michael.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Robustness of replication
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
  - From: Jorgen Lundman <lundman@lundman.net>
- Re: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Robustness of replication (was: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.)
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: Robustness of replication (was: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Robustness of replication (was: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.)
Next by Date: Re: Deleted DNs, and the great quest.
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread