[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32

To: "David J. Andruczyk" <djandruczyk@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
From: John Madden <jmadden@ivytech.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:28:18 -0400
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <828701.77969.qm@web33807.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0907211414160.12094-100000@eclipse.cl.msu.edu> <142668.88207.qm@web33802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1248209227.8897.2.camel@quagmire> <828701.77969.qm@web33807.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:03 -0700, David J. Andruczyk wrote:
> yep,  for a production environment,  running on only one, is a sure
> fire way to earn myself a sparkling new pink slip...

That's pretty vague...   Only one machine is not the same as "asking for
a pink slip."  There are plenty of ways to accomplish HA in this
scenario, if that's what you're getting at.

John

-- 
John Madden
Sr UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@ivytech.edu

References:
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: "Sean O'Malley" <omalleys@msu.edu>
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: "David J. Andruczyk" <djandruczyk@yahoo.com>
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: John Madden <jmadden@ivytech.edu>
- Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
  - From: "David J. Andruczyk" <djandruczyk@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
Next by Date: RE: Unique overlay usage with filter
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread