[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
- To: John Madden <jmadden@ivytech.edu>
- Subject: Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
- From: "David J. Andruczyk" <djandruczyk@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1248228232; bh=gxloMXh7JTW85YHQS9ZZHh1beUXBB3ZomL0xXpL+2j4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=F9cOjuZjYHu7+QC1sOvvUsHCzkADk9UJNORrikF7KaBLdUkz4gTWZN+g07P+3/8Bb877rAU0FuSB2336MBOel6jRscs/6c+BcDQ+6YNb+P2iCXMmk8ciXEHfKUs5YywFVtotm7ih7ixsRMhtlhI1dycbUPdKOEGsDvhxvGGtcvo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=r3Rk1E3pu2V5qftEGg2rONGwfnkKtVO6z1s6g6f9FS1Sgd92cvGJJ1OM+/5w17l1k5eHwj5qKks7EbwqycPT7y1yVX3bSdA6qsM2SuiBDQ7caug9+cTEpanUwuVt29EVMUTX43j26xq64Kb78icR9Gga7wNRL+Bf04rOqMVJ//o=;
- In-reply-to: <1248209227.8897.2.camel@quagmire>
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0907211414160.12094-100000@eclipse.cl.msu.edu> <142668.88207.qm@web33802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1248209227.8897.2.camel@quagmire>
yep, for a production environment, running on only one, is a sure fire way to earn myself a sparkling new pink slip...
-- David J. Andruczyk
----- Original Message ----
From: John Madden <jmadden@ivytech.edu>
To: David J. Andruczyk <djandruczyk@yahoo.com>
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 4:47:07 PM
Subject: Re: performance issue behind a a load balancer 2.3.32
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:39 -0700, David J. Andruczyk wrote:
> This is a large production environment (several hundred servers,
> thousands of requests per minute) and the F5-LB is used to balance the
> load and take care if a node needs to be taken out of service for maint
Given, I run a smaller environment, but even on a several-years-old
v2.2.x install I regularly see several thousand requests per second --
not minute -- with tons of logging enabled -- handled while hardly
touching the CPU. Are you sure you really need multiple machines?
John
--
John Madden
Sr UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@ivytech.edu