[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Can one OpenLDAP 2.2 machine be a master for one directory and a slave for another?

To: Nick Urbanik <nick.urbanik@optusnet.com.au>
Subject: Re: Can one OpenLDAP 2.2 machine be a master for one directory and a slave for another?
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:14:08 +0200
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <20090520043852.GA31729@nick.optusnet.com.au>
References: <20090520043852.GA31729@nick.optusnet.com.au>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090402 SeaMonkey/1.1.16

Nick Urbanik wrote:
> 
> to reduce the number of machines needed for test, I would like to use
> one machine as the master for one suffix and the slurpd slave for another,
> unrelated suffix.  However, it seems that slurpd may not support
> that.  Is that correct?

How about starting two instances of slapd on different ports and test
replication. Note that OpenLDAP 2.2 is a really ancient release and
slurpd is no longer available in recent OpenLDAP releases. You should
use 2.4.16 for now.

Ciao, Michael.

References:
- Can one OpenLDAP 2.2 machine be a master for one directory and a slave for another?
  - From: Nick Urbanik <nick.urbanik@optusnet.com.au>

Prev by Date: Can one OpenLDAP 2.2 machine be a master for one directory and a slave for another?
Next by Date: Replication
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread