[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Can one OpenLDAP 2.2 machine be a master for one directory and a slave for another?

To: openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: Can one OpenLDAP 2.2 machine be a master for one directory and a slave for another?
From: Nick Urbanik <nick.urbanik@optusnet.com.au>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:38:52 +1000
Content-disposition: inline
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

Dear Folks,

to reduce the number of machines needed for test, I would like to use
one machine as the master for one suffix and the slurpd slave for another,
unrelated suffix.  However, it seems that slurpd may not support
that.  Is that correct?
--
Nick Urbanik http://nicku.org 808-71011 nick.urbanik@optusnet.com.au
GPG: 7FFA CDC7 5A77 0558 DC7A 790A 16DF EC5B BB9D 2C24  ID: BB9D2C24
I disclaim, therefore I am.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can one OpenLDAP 2.2 machine be a master for one directory and a slave for another?
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

Prev by Date: Re: slow slapadd?
Next by Date: Re: Can one OpenLDAP 2.2 machine be a master for one directory and a slave for another?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread