Re: some questions about syncrepl

[Tony Earnshaw <tonni@hetnet.nl>]

Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev, on 09-10-2007 21:22:

[...]

> > "Yes, there's a reason I'm sticking to 2.3.33 on the provider for the
> > time being."
> >
> > Now what could that be? (Hint: I've written about it before, but all you
> > could comment was, that you required proof. Whilst I'm running a
> > production machine, required to be up 24x7x52).
>
> Which is what I was running as well.  And it wasn't working.  I'm simply 
> pointing out that although it is working for you at *this* moment, 
> there's no guarantee it'll work in the next, because it could hit any of 
> those known issues at any given time.  You are, essentially, playing 
> russian roulette.  But, as you note, it is your head and their platter. ;)

It's fall vacation for the school next week, I'll try OL 2.3.38 then - 
we're also going to implement ppolicy (got the latter working perfectly 
on my FC6 test machine). The beauty of rpms is that it's a matter of 
seconds to revert and completely cleanly if something goes wrong with a 
new software version. I'll post what happens ...

--Tonni

--
Tony Earnshaw
Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl