Re: some questions about syncrepl

[Tony Earnshaw <tonni@hetnet.nl>]

Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev, on 09-10-2007 18:56:

[...}


> While I'm glad it is working for you, I ran into problems using 
> delta-syncrepl in all releases prior to 2.3.35, and even then, I had to 
> substantially patch it with bits from 2.3.36, just the way in which 
> they'd show up differed.  Hence things like ITS#4904, ITS#4813, 
> ITS#4720, ITS#4977 all of which were fixed after 2.3.33.  So how robust 
> your setup actually is vs your perception can be very different things.  
> I.e., you knowingly put yourself and your community at risk by running 
> the release you are using.

"Yes, there's a reason I'm sticking to 2.3.33 on the provider for the 
time being."

Now what could that be? (Hint: I've written about it before, but all you 
could comment was, that you required proof. Whilst I'm running a 
production machine, required to be up 24x7x52).

--Tonni

--
Tony Earnshaw
Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl