[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:12:29 -0800
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.58.0512132137040.17712@toolbox.rutgers.edu>
References: <Pine.SOL.4.58.0512131826380.17712@toolbox.rutgers.edu> <CF302586DC76B81B7752553F@cadabra-sw.stanford.edu> <439F676C.7050707@symas.com> <Pine.SOL.4.58.0512132137040.17712@toolbox.rutgers.edu>

--On Tuesday, December 13, 2005 10:09 PM -0500 Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu> wrote:

At this stage, CVS HEAD and 2.3 are close enough that anyone can just
pull the necessary patches out of HEAD.


I don't disagree, but at the same time, there's something comforting about
running a nice virgin tarball.

Hm, I can't recall the last time I ran a non-updated version of OpenLDAP in production... ;) Of course, one of my stated goals every year is 100% uptime, so I'm somewhat motivated to keep my servers running top-notch. And I've hit my goal 2 years running...

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/Shared Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

References:
- syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
- Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
Next by Date: Re: syncrepl'd MOD deleted(?) entry
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread