Our master had a LDIF submitted to it changing the value of one
attribute:
Dec 12 09:03:06 master.rutgers.edu slapd[11736] [ID 249368 local4.debug]
conn=647307 op=2 MOD dn="uid=xxx,ou=People,dc=eden,dc=rutgers,dc=edu"
The entry syncrepl'd, apparently:
Dec 12 09:03:31 slave1.rutgers.edu slapd[15453]: [ID 260518
local4.debug]
syncrepl_entry: uid=xxx,ou=People,dc=eden,dc=rutgers,dc=edu Dec 12
09:05:36 slave2.rutgers.edu slapd[3515]: [ID 260518 local4.debug]
syncrepl_entry: uid=xxx,ou=People,dc=eden,dc=rutgers,dc=edu Dec 12
09:05:41 slave3.rutgers.edu slapd[3901]: [ID 260518 local4.debug]
syncrepl_entry: uid=xxx,ou=People,dc=eden,dc=rutgers,dc=edu Dec 12
09:06:13 slave5.rutgers.edu slapd[2581]: [ID 260518 local4.debug]
syncrepl_entry: uid=xxx,ou=People,dc=eden,dc=rutgers,dc=edu
Don't worry, slave4 has a failed HDD. So this is great.
What's not great is now the slaves don't have the entry anymore.
slave3$ slapcat -b "dc=eden,dc=rutgers,dc=edu" | grep \
"uid=xxx,ou=People,dc=eden,dc=rutgers,dc=edu" | wc -l
0
ldapsearch(1) against slave{1,2,5} confirms (less conclusively) that
they
don't see this entry either. There's lots of stuff in the ITS that this
*could* be, but I can't tell with any certainty. Thoughts?