Re: Stability OL 2.3.11?

[Tony Earnshaw <billy@billy.demon.nl>]

Buchan Milne wrote:

[...]

> My 2.3.x LDAP boxen don't hit production for another 2 weeks, but to avoid 
> more version creep (which affects lots of documentation, project plans, test 
> plans etc)

Don't mention it! That's, amongst other things,  is why we stuck to
2.2.17. Plus, that that version's proved itself so stable in practice.

> we'll probably be sticking with 2.3.9 + the odd patch from CVS, of 
> course on 4.2.52.4 + patch. Also, these boxen will initially only have 20 000 
> or so entries (compared to the > 250 000 on our other set).

20 000 is more than 1 150.

> I was hoping to see some comments from Dusty Doris, whose 2.3.7 boxen with 
> ~400 000 entries should have been in production for 3 weeks by now.

Dusty? Where are you? But I don't think I'd have considered 2.3.7 for
production use; best before, etc. 2.3.9.

--Tonni

--
Mail: tonye@billy.demon.nl
http://www.billy.demon.nl