On Friday 14 October 2005 11:39, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > Hi list, > > (Autumn|Fall) semester vacation (in Holland begins Monday 24th October) > I plan on upgrading various software utilities on 2 RHAS3 production > servers (master, slurpd slave), more than 1150 users who use OL > authentication and user base for *everything*, the OL servers really get > hammered. These have been running OL 2.2.17 on patched BDB 4.2.52 for > more than 13 months, with extended uptimes (months at a time), > absolutely no problems. > > I'd like to upgrade OL to 2.3.11, because of the greatly extended > functionality WRT 2.2. I've been running 2.3 on my RHAS3/RHAS4 test > servers for months and have found both 2.3.9 and 2.3.11 to be stable and > fine, do everything I want, and with GQ I can GUI-change all olc > configuration parameters that I wish on the fly. Great :) > > I'd be very grateful for others' (especially Quanah's and Buchan's) > comments on 2.3 patch level 9-11 with patched BDB 4.2.52's stability in > production before I definitely go ahead. It's a fine product, I've > gained enough experience with it, and I'd like to give it its head. My 2.3.x LDAP boxen don't hit production for another 2 weeks, but to avoid more version creep (which affects lots of documentation, project plans, test plans etc) we'll probably be sticking with 2.3.9 + the odd patch from CVS, of course on 4.2.52.4 + patch. Also, these boxen will initially only have 20 000 or so entries (compared to the > 250 000 on our other set). I was hoping to see some comments from Dusty Doris, whose 2.3.7 boxen with ~~400 000 entries should have been in production for 3 weeks by now. Regards, Buchan -- Buchan Milne ISP Systems Specialist B.Eng,RHCE(803004789010797),LPIC-2(LPI000074592)
Attachment:
pgpRQI5coozvy.pgp
Description: PGP signature