Re: bug fix -> version question

[Dan Armbrust <daniel.armbrust.list@gmail.com>]

Sorry for the dumb question.  I actually saw it in the changes file 
shortly after I made the post.

Where I initially got stuck was that previously, the bug mentioned 
something about "checked into REL22" or something along those lines... 
and i was trying to figure out how your CVS tags correspond to your 
release version numbers...

I didn't read the bug report very closely, because I was just following 
up on a note that Howard sent me a while ago where he mentioned that he 
thought that the fix for this bug would also fix another bug that I 
opened.  I'm testing that right now, and wanted to make sure I was 
testing against the right version.

Dan



Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

> --On Wednesday, May 11, 2005 2:41 PM -0500 Dan Armbrust 
> <daniel.armbrust.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is the bug fix for this (
> > http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=3666;selectid=36 
> >
> > 66;statetype=-1
> > ) in version 2.3.3beta, or do I need to check out the HEAD release (or
> > some other flag?) from CVS to get it?
> >
> > Is it in 2.2.26?
> >
> > How could I figure this out for myself?
>
>
> First, I'd read the comments in the bug report:
>
> "This bug does not affect HEAD/2.3 as the offending functions were 
> deleted
> already."
>
> As for the 2.2.26 question, look at the change log:
>
> <http://www.openldap.org/software/release/changes.html>
>
> The bug was fixed in 2.2.25
>
> --Quanah
>
> --
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Principal Software Developer
> ITSS/Shared Services
> Stanford University
> GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html