[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
bug fix -> version question
- Subject: bug fix -> version question
- From: Dan Armbrust <daniel.armbrust.list@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:41:01 -0500
- Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OVEZvNfPriB+g3rwyZKPP9aRTbXfcG7/tzcsajHvaq+4N3rrF+wdkaNcC2JZUaFipInNzcEOcbeEgJP+L9eGfHTnE5WbLI5ntONr+Jc/vwBH18in85BMWGJHScSfVDeL6FAPKsF8M/4CNHUzpxjqhe6NGXdIFUo6zH+EHEysG1Y=
- In-reply-to: <20050511160850.GA5393@pdesktop.pp.htv.fi>
- References: <20050511160850.GA5393@pdesktop.pp.htv.fi>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
Is the bug fix for this (
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=3666;selectid=3666;statetype=-1
) in version 2.3.3beta, or do I need to check out the HEAD release (or
some other flag?) from CVS to get it?
Is it in 2.2.26?
How could I figure this out for myself?
Thanks,
Dan