Re: BDB vs. HDB

• To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
• Subject: Re: BDB vs. HDB
• From: Gavin Henry <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>
• Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 00:46:45 +0000
• Content-disposition: inline
• In-reply-to: <1109881781.8321.31.camel@d80h243>
• Organization: Suretec Systems Ltd.
• References: <D0859E45-8C0C-11D9-9071-000A959133A8@u.washington.edu> <3837008AC10A52A16217A7C8@[10.0.0.1]> <1109881781.8321.31.camel@d80h243>
• User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

• References:
  • Re: BDB vs. HDB
    • From: Donn Cave <donn@u.washington.edu>
  • Re: BDB vs. HDB
    • From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
  • Re: BDB vs. HDB
    • From: "Matthew J. Smith" <matt.smith@uconn.edu>

• Prev by Date: Re: ch_free symbol undefined while loading dynamic backend
• Next by Date: Re: BDB vs. HDB
• Index(es):
  • Chronological
  • Thread