Thank you again for the information. Could someone please point me to documentation on configuring the idlcache? Thank you, -Matt On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 10:43 -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > > --On Thursday, March 03, 2005 9:51 AM -0800 Donn Cave > <donn@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Thursday, March 3, 2005, at 09:01 AM, Matthew J. Smith wrote: > >> Given a brand new OpenLDAP 2.2.23 installation, is there any reason to > >> continue to use BDB instead of HDB, or can I safely move everything to > >> HDB? Do the Berkley 4.2.52+ db_* tools support HDB? I recall a > >> problem > >> with db_verify once upon a time... > > > > One thing to test would be performance on queries with the > > search base different from the database suffix. If you see > > the problem I thought I was seeing, hdb will be an order of > > magnitude worse in this case. That was with an older version, > > 2.2.17 I think, and of course the usual caveats with respect > > to tuning parameters. > > HDB relies heavily on the idlcache. If you do not properly configure the > system with a large enough idlcache, you will see issues around queries. > > --Quanah > > > -- > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Principal Software Developer > ITSS/Shared Services > Stanford University > GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html Matthew J. Smith University of Connecticut ITS This message sent at Thu Mar 3 15:27:32 2005 PGP Key: http://web.uconn.edu/dotmatt/matt.asc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part