[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: 2.2.23 vs 2.3.1alpha speed compairisons
--On Monday, February 21, 2005 8:44 PM -0500 Samuel Tran <stran@amnh.org>
wrote:
If you have 4,000 entries, why would you try and cache 100,000? You're
never going to fill that. I also don't see any idlcachesize setting
here.
Should I set cachesize to the size of my directory, ie 4,000 ?
Ok. I forgot idlcachesize. I am not sure what size I should use here.
For the cachesize, I'd do your size + a few for growth? ;) Maybe 4400 or
something.
The idlcachesize is explained here:
<http://www.stanford.edu/services/directory/openldap/configuration/slapd-conf-replica.html>
Basically it is a cache of the result set for a given query, so it will
fill up with the most commonly requested searches.
Also, is the 350 queries/second from a single process doing the query,
or multiple processes? A single process querying will never give you
the full results of the servers performance.
No each query is done by a single process.
Ah, then the result you are seeing isn't really a mark of how well the
server performs overall then. ;) In fact, the rate in this case could be
limited by how fast they querying process can perform, and not the server.
;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/Shared Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
"These censorship operations against schools and libraries are stronger
than ever in the present religio-political climate. They often focus on
fantasy and sf books, which foster that deadly enemy to bigotry and blind
faith, the imagination." -- Ursula K. Le Guin