Daniel, On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 16:47, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote: > > I tried another run with logging turned on, but using bigger buffers as suggested above - performance was still horrible. I saw very little improvement. > > On the plus side, I rebuilt 2.3.1alpha against BerkeleyDB 4.2.52 - and its performance is pretty much equal to that of the 2.2.23, for my little tests anyway. > > Has anyone filed a bug with Sleepycat about this? It seems like a pretty major thing for OpenLdap users. Do you mean that you have better performance with 2.3.1alpha + BDB 4.2.52 than with 2.3.1.alpha + BDB 4.3.27? Thanks for your benchmarks. -- Samuel Tran <stran@amnh.org> Systems Administration - Information Technology American Museum of Natural History (P) 212-313-7231
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part