[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?

To: OpenLDAP Discussion List <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
From: Dick Davies <rasputnik@hellooperator.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:31:27 +0000
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <20041125135434.GP15141@conectiva.com.br>
References: <A04B6AE6ED3BD742B64D5B17093F64E2913029@IMSSGPX01.ims.mhm.mhc> <20041125135434.GP15141@conectiva.com.br>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

* Andreas Hasenack <andreas@conectiva.com.br> [1103 14:03]:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 09:35:37PM +0800, Tay, Gary wrote:
> > Another odd is packaging, the default install for server or client may not pull in all the RPMs you are expecting:
> > 
> > openldap-devel-2.X.XX-X (include files + ldap libs)
> 
> Why would you need devel files (include files and libbla.so link) on a server?

To compile packages?

-- 
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people
very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. - The Guide
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
  - From: Andreas Hasenack <andreas@conectiva.com.br>

References:
- RE: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
  - From: "Tay, Gary" <Gary_Tay@platts.com>
- Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
  - From: Andreas Hasenack <andreas@conectiva.com.br>

Prev by Date: Re: How to get the Directory's last modification time?
Next by Date: Re: Is the Redhat's openldap distribution broken?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread