[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: segfaults when using ldap and monitor backend?

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: segfaults when using ldap and monitor backend?
From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <jerry@samba.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:28:45 -0500
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <311430493.1067004154@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>
References: <3F99315F.7060600@samba.org> <311430493.1067004154@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031016

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

| It sounds to me more like a conflict between
| back-ldap and back-monitor. Have you tried putting
| the back-ldap definition after the back-monitor
| definition?

Yeah.  That's what I thought too.  I did
originally have the ldap backend listed after
the monitor declaration and slapd started ok.

But due to some tricks  was trying to play
with the suffix of the bdb and ldap backends
I had to move the ldap section to the top
of my slapd.conf.  That's when I noticed the crash.

It's no big deal right now, but if I get
time next week, I'll catch it in gdb and
see what's going on.

Thanks for the feedback.

cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/mZmMIR7qMdg1EfYRAnuEAKDqnn8LBz6UDK9AMrSbTB2FrmEtpwCfYyKB
V2ndh42xssxCb18EkRPmVyg=
=rvTi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: segfaults when using ldap and monitor backend?
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

References:
- segfaults when using ldap and monitor backend?
  - From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <jerry@samba.org>
- Re: segfaults when using ldap and monitor backend?
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: segfaults when using ldap and monitor backend?
Next by Date: Re: segfaults when using ldap and monitor backend?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread