RE: [ISSUE?] : jpegPhoto, EQUALITY, octetStringMatch (OL 2.1.17)

["Kirill Kovalenko" <kirill@softerra.com>]

> Michael Stroeder wrote:
> Why do you think that this operation is more expensive THAN e.g. 
> LDAP_MOD_REPLACE?

I mean that both methods are more expensive then just remove+add or just add one more value.

> Judging from my personal experience especially with binary attributes 
> like userCertificate and jpegPhoto it's more robust with various LDAP servers.

Agree. But my original question was about EQUALITY specification. 
Why not just to add it to the schema?  Is it because the jpegPhoto specification from RFC2798 
does not specify it? 

Extra questions: 
	- Why octetStringMatch is not accepted by server? 
	- What are the general recommendations about EQUALITY MR if I need to create my own 
	schema which contains a binary attribute?   

-
Kirill