[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
What dictates the success of SSHA?
- To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: What dictates the success of SSHA?
- From: "Andrew A. Raines" <drew@poured.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:17:15 -0600
- Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVsSR4mGwapfE3Nn3Dv2rff s4NyAQZwAAACUklEQVR4nG2Ty67jIAyGDXkBUmn21DT7Hhz2oxb2o4Df/1XmN2nP6UgTVarw5/uF 1vkFwm9+nvC81UpT7gK5KY7/glPZR88cyX2AU87MknmC/Q0iAHNOReQTQNkMUipaJP6AQD5H+Jet quodIIwJLtM3i4zaqh4wuNQTFOnaRRV6tXVYbD8AYoA24Oy6hsVAMFcsBTYCd2LAG7i4i+WURGbO Rb/WhccESBZKiWeRm/5ZbzIt4sKWc8lELvBWf4dNZwwAj6bsB6NZpdbDpxdIwjHyaMJc4PwxPZ0A 5SVkKhk11mPoG6iiEHtMSa/jBNmKO0H9pv8BrYwTrEl0qJRvALUTeLTjBN109aWCoq1PM9GeJuAz +AoTzYxA+CsWLuwvEEQyKolejzTB7Q3QWWFCO3rS8mGBvF61t5m5Hx9ALLUxB5m3+gYeo8MUmdhi 5PK2CIvYkGjrNvievWdvWvhStrGLVutNdqstIMF9fy0WOo+NEOyPjysVBMR22pRgIZI6tjckRygY Flk4FbPIqUPbD0el8wwg1lMV2F1XP5qj3DkTwExSc1K5BxlPRz0yRY8LUFtcVFKsEHG2TLibNJe3 R28tKPXYHcXg71hNSwt3lsxlr1Id3SlHuzOeqyuyQ657u8ICMdwpRyd2pFyxfV9kOx3dcRqkrdej 9dz0NwKbrL0Arqo3xgQeeHnI6nMervbxrKU0bIpZ+MioIVNEV1prC260DSuOM24Ly35I/vXYUcao xw0RPCWA5y67XkMbqWrTrdF9iWHDpt3LcbiVbogyxmPUvxzIzHOcmIeEAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
- User-agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, usg-unix-v)
I'd like to migrate from {crypt}.
I have a few Solaris 8 machines which authenticate logins via
pam_ldap with an OpenLDAP 2.0.18 server. userPasswords work fine
using {crypt}, but if I throw in an [SSHA}-encrypted one,
authentication fails on the Solaris *7* machine.
Why would the OS version matter? After experimenting with
different combinations of pam_ldap, OpenLDAP, and OpenSSL, it seems
that OS is the only waivering factor.
Any ideas?
I realize this is probably a question more suited for a PADL list,
but I thought I would try here first in case slapd was at fault.
Would 2.1.x handle this better?
Thanks,
-Drew