[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: UTF-8 & internationalization

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: UTF-8 & internationalization
From: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:08:37 +0100
Cc: Alvin Wong <alvin.wong@spanlink.com>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020110154352.01780310@127.0.0.1>; from Kurt@OpenLDAP.org on Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:45:19PM -0800
References: <A2C84545F97931458CAB1411A836988D287DFD@splkexch1.spanlink.com> <A2C84545F97931458CAB1411A836988D287DFD@splkexch1.spanlink.com> <20020110144451.A652@itea.ntnu.no> <5.1.0.14.0.20020110154352.01780310@127.0.0.1>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:45:19PM -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> At 05:44 AM 2002-01-10, Stig Venaas wrote:
> >There might be an issue with Unicode normalization.
> 
> Since Alvin was using 2.0, the lack of any Unicode
> normalization is an issue.  But it appeared that he
> had more basic problems, e.g. UTF-8 encoding issues.

Oops, I'm very surprised then, I really don't see why it should
happen in 2.0 (not that it should anyway). I'll still look at
this when I get home, maybe I test it with HEAD as well.

Stig

References:
- RE: UTF-8 & internationalization
  - From: "Alvin Wong" <alvin.wong@spanlink.com>
- Re: UTF-8 & internationalization
  - From: Stig Venaas <Stig@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: UTF-8 & internationalization
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: UTF-8 & internationalization
Next by Date: search by TLS
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread