[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]
Re: UTF-8 & internationalization

To: "Huang Yuzhen" <huangyuzhen@bj.tom.com>
Subject: Re: UTF-8 & internationalization
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:56:18 -0800
Cc: "Alvin Wong" <alvin.wong@spanlink.com>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <028c01c19a4a$54cca640$7e05a8c0@huangyz>
References: <A2C84545F97931458CAB1411A836988D287DFD@splkexch1.spanlink.com>
At 06:47 PM 2002-01-10, Huang Yuzhen wrote:
>Hi,
>I found the mistake from the long log file,
>that is the line:
>15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104:     filter: (employeeNumber=\E5\A4)
>
>In your condition,this line should be " filter: (employeeNumber=\E5\A4\A9)".
>Maybe the command line tools cause this mistake.

All of the OpenLDAP programs expect UTF-8.  If the
local environment (platform) does not provide UTF-8,
the user must properly escape anything needing escaping.

>You can test with this command:
>ldapsearch -LLL "(employeeNumber=å¤©)"
>for some reason it could be typing wrong,so use the below (it is base64
>encoded):
>
>bGRhcHNlYXJjaCAtTExMICIoZW1wbG95ZWVOdW1iZXI95aSpKSI=
>
>I also use Chinese characters in utf8 with openldap 2.0.18(linux), it work
>fine for me.
>I hope you can enjoy it.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Alvin Wong" <alvin.wong@spanlink.com>
>To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
>Cc: <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
>Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:41 AM
>Subject: RE: UTF-8 & internationalization
>
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Here are 3 of the entries:
>>
>> dn: employeeNumber=abc123,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink
>> Communications
>> objectClass: splkAgent
>> displayName: abc123
>> employeeNumber: abc123
>> supflag: 1
>> userPassword:: YWJjMTIz
>> tid: abc123
>> acdid: abc123
>> acdpw: abc123
>> ctiid: abc123
>> ctipw: abc123
>> employeeType: 1
>> wf: abc123
>> agtref: -1
>> ts: 0
>> creatorsName: cn=Spanlink, ou=People, o=Spanlink Communications
>> createTimestamp: 20020109213105Z
>> modifiersName: cn=Spanlink, ou=People, o=Spanlink Communications
>> modifyTimestamp: 20020109213105Z
>>
>> dn::
>> ZW1wbG95ZWVOdW1iZXI95aSp5YWN6LS56K+VLG91PUFnZW50cyxvdT1DYWxsIENlbnRlciAx
>> L
>>  G89U3BhbmxpbmsgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbnM=
>> objectClass: splkAgent
>> displayName:: 5aSp5YWN6LS56K+V
>> employeeNumber:: 5aSp5YWN6LS56K+V
>> supflag: 1
>> userPassword:: 5aSp5YWN6LS56K+V
>> tid:: 5aSp5YWN6LS56K+V
>> acdid:: 5aSp5YWN6LS56K+V
>> acdpw:: 5aSp5YWN6LS56K+V
>> ctiid:: 5aSp5YWN6LS56K+V
>> ctipw:: 5aSp5YWN6LS56K+V
>> employeeType: 1
>> wf:: 5aSp5YWN6LS56K+V
>> agtref: -1
>> ts: 0
>> creatorsName: cn=Spanlink, ou=People, o=Spanlink Communications
>> createTimestamp: 20020109213124Z
>> modifiersName: cn=Spanlink, ou=People, o=Spanlink Communications
>> modifyTimestamp: 20020109213124Z
>>
>> dn::
>> ZW1wbG95ZWVOdW1iZXI95aQsb3U9QWdlbnRzLG91PUNhbGwgQ2VudGVyIDEsbz1TcGFubGlu
>> a
>>  yBDb21tdW5pY2F0aW9ucw==
>> objectClass: splkAgent
>> displayName:: 5aSp
>> employeeNumber:: 5aSp
>> supflag: 1
>> userPassword:: 5aSp
>> tid:: 5aSp
>> acdid:: 5aSp
>> acdpw:: 5aSp
>> ctiid:: 5aSp
>> ctipw:: 5aSp
>> employeeType: 1
>> wf:: 5aSp
>> agtref: -1
>> ts: 0
>> creatorsName: cn=Spanlink, ou=People, o=Spanlink Communications
>> createTimestamp: 20020109213141Z
>> modifiersName: cn=Spanlink, ou=People, o=Spanlink Communications
>> modifyTimestamp: 20020109213141Z
>>
>> It can find the first 2 entries but not the third. The only differences
>> are the first entry is in English which doesn't have any problems, the
>> second contains even number of Chinese characters and the third has odd
>> number of Chinese characters.
>>
>> A portion of the debug 5 follows. I did a search for abc123 (at
>> 15:31:58), follow by the entry with 4 Chinese characters (at 15:32:12),
>> and the entry with 1 Chinese character (at 15:32:21).
>>
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 291: connection_get(272)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_get(272): got connid=0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_read(272): checking for input
>> on id=0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next: tag 0x30 len 54 contents:
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next on fd 272 failed
>> errno=10035 (WSAEWOULDBLOCK)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: do_search
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ber_scanf fmt ({aiiiib) ber:
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: SRCH "o=Spanlink Communications" 1
>> 015:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:     0 4000 0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ber_scanf fmt (o) ber:
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:     filter: (ou=*)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ber_scanf fmt ({v}}) ber:
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:     attrs:15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => ldbm_back_search
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: dn2entry_r: dn: "O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS"
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => dn2id( "O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_find_entry_dn2id("O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS"): 1 (1 tries)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= dn2id 1 (in cache)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => id2entry_r( 1 )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 1
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 1 )
>> "o=Spanlink Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= id2entry_r( 1 ) 0x62b160 (cache)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: search_candidates: base="O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS" s=1 d=0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => list_candidates 0xa0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => dn2idl( "O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => ldbm_cache_open( "dn2id.dbb", 9, 600 )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 0)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 1
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => list_candidates 0xa1
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => equality_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => ldbm_cache_open( "objectClass.dbb", 9,
>> 600 )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 3)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => key_read
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= index_read 0 candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= equality_candidates NULL
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= equality_candidates 0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => presence_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= presence_candidates: index_param
>> returned=18
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= list_candidates 16
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= list_candidates 1
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 1
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 1
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 1 ): returned
>> (0)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => id2entry_r( 3 )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 3
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 3 ) "ou=Call
>> Center 1,o=Spanlink Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= id2entry_r( 3 ) 0x62b0c0 (cache)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => send_search_entry: "ou=Call Center
>> 1,o=Spanlink Communications"
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= send_search_entry
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 3
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 3 ): returned
>> (0)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: send_ldap_search_result 0::
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: send_ldap_response: msgid=31 tag=101
>> err=0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 291: connection_get(272)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_get(272): got connid=0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_read(272): checking for input
>> on id=0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next: tag 0x30 len 103 contents:
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next on fd 272 failed
>> errno=10035 (WSAEWOULDBLOCK)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: do_search
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ber_scanf fmt ({aiiiib) ber:
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: SRCH "ou=Agents,ou=Call Center
>> 1,o=Spanlink Communications" 1 015:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104:     0
>> 4000 0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ber_scanf fmt ({oo}) ber:
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104:     filter: (employeeNumber=abc123)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ber_scanf fmt ({v}}) ber:
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104:     attrs:15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4
>> 104:
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => ldbm_back_search
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: dn2entry_r: dn: "OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL
>> CENTER 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS"
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => dn2id( "OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER
>> 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====>
>> cache_find_entry_dn2id("OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER 1,O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS"): 4 (1 tries)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= dn2id 4 (in cache)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 4 )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 4
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 4 )
>> "ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 4 ) 0x62da60 (cache)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: search_candidates:
>> base="OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" s=1 d=0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => list_candidates 0xa0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => dn2idl( "OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER
>> 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => ldbm_cache_open( "dn2id.dbb", 9, 600
>> )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 0)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 3
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => list_candidates 0xa1
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => equality_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => ldbm_cache_open( "objectClass.dbb",
>> 9, 600 )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 3)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => key_read
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= index_read 0 candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= equality_candidates NULL
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= equality_candidates 0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 0
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => equality_candidates
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= equality_candidates: index_param
>> returned=18
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= list_candidates 16
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= list_candidates 3
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 3
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 4
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 4 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 13 )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 13
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 13 )
>> "employeeNumber=abc123,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink
>> Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 13 ) 0x630640 (cache)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => send_search_entry:
>> "employeeNumber=abc123,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink
>> Communications"
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= send_search_entry
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 13
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 13 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 14 )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 14
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 14 )
>> "employeeNumber=Ã¥Â¤Â©Ã¥...Â?Ã¨Â´Â¹Ã¨Â¯*,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink
>> Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 14 ) 0x6319e0 (cache)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ldbm_search: candidate 14 does not match
>> filter
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 14
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 14 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 15 )
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 15
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 15 )
>> "employeeNumber=Ã¥Â¤,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink Communications"
>> (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 15 ) 0x632130 (cache)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ldbm_search: candidate 15 does not match
>> filter
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 15
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 15 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: send_ldap_search_result 0::
>> 15:31:58 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: send_ldap_response: msgid=32 tag=101
>> err=0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 291: connection_get(272)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_get(272): got connid=0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_read(272): checking for input
>> on id=0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next: tag 0x30 len 54 contents:
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next on fd 272 failed
>> errno=10035 (WSAEWOULDBLOCK)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: do_search
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ber_scanf fmt ({aiiiib) ber:
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: SRCH "o=Spanlink Communications" 1
>> 015:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:     0 4000 0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ber_scanf fmt (o) ber:
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:     filter: (ou=*)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ber_scanf fmt ({v}}) ber:
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:     attrs:15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => ldbm_back_search
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: dn2entry_r: dn: "O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS"
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => dn2id( "O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_find_entry_dn2id("O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS"): 1 (1 tries)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= dn2id 1 (in cache)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => id2entry_r( 1 )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 1
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 1 )
>> "o=Spanlink Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= id2entry_r( 1 ) 0x62b160 (cache)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: search_candidates: base="O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS" s=1 d=0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => list_candidates 0xa0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => dn2idl( "O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => ldbm_cache_open( "dn2id.dbb", 9, 600 )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 0)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 1
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => list_candidates 0xa1
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => equality_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => ldbm_cache_open( "objectClass.dbb", 9,
>> 600 )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 3)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => key_read
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= index_read 0 candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= equality_candidates NULL
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= equality_candidates 0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => presence_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= presence_candidates: index_param
>> returned=18
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= list_candidates 16
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= list_candidates 1
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 1
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 1
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 1 ): returned
>> (0)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => id2entry_r( 3 )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 3
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 3 ) "ou=Call
>> Center 1,o=Spanlink Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= id2entry_r( 3 ) 0x62b0c0 (cache)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => send_search_entry: "ou=Call Center
>> 1,o=Spanlink Communications"
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= send_search_entry
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 3
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 3 ): returned
>> (0)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: send_ldap_search_result 0::
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: send_ldap_response: msgid=33 tag=101
>> err=0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 291: connection_get(272)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_get(272): got connid=0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_read(272): checking for input
>> on id=0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next: tag 0x30 len 109 contents:
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next on fd 272 failed
>> errno=10035 (WSAEWOULDBLOCK)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: do_search
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ber_scanf fmt ({aiiiib) ber:
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: SRCH "ou=Agents,ou=Call Center
>> 1,o=Spanlink Communications" 1 015:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104:     0
>> 4000 0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ber_scanf fmt ({oo}) ber:
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104:     filter:
>> (employeeNumber=\E5\A4\A9\E5\85\8D\E8\B4\B9\E8\AF\95)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ber_scanf fmt ({v}}) ber:
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104:     attrs:15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4
>> 104:
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => ldbm_back_search
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: dn2entry_r: dn: "OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL
>> CENTER 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS"
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => dn2id( "OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER
>> 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====>
>> cache_find_entry_dn2id("OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER 1,O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS"): 4 (1 tries)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= dn2id 4 (in cache)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 4 )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 4
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 4 )
>> "ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 4 ) 0x62da60 (cache)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: search_candidates:
>> base="OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" s=1 d=0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => list_candidates 0xa0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => dn2idl( "OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER
>> 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => ldbm_cache_open( "dn2id.dbb", 9, 600
>> )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 0)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 3
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => list_candidates 0xa1
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => equality_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => ldbm_cache_open( "objectClass.dbb",
>> 9, 600 )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 3)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => key_read
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= index_read 0 candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= equality_candidates NULL
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= equality_candidates 0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 0
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => equality_candidates
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= equality_candidates: index_param
>> returned=18
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= list_candidates 16
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= list_candidates 3
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 3
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 4
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 4 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 13 )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 13
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 13 )
>> "employeeNumber=abc123,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink
>> Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 13 ) 0x630640 (cache)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ldbm_search: candidate 13 does not match
>> filter
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 13
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 13 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 14 )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 14
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 14 )
>> "employeeNumber=Ã¥Â¤Â©Ã¥...Â?Ã¨Â´Â¹Ã¨Â¯*,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink
>> Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 14 ) 0x6319e0 (cache)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => send_search_entry:
>> "employeeNumber=Ã¥Â¤Â©Ã¥...Â?Ã¨Â´Â¹Ã¨Â¯*,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink
>> Communications"
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= send_search_entry
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 14
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 14 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 15 )
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 15
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 15 )
>> "employeeNumber=Ã¥Â¤,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink Communications"
>> (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 15 ) 0x632130 (cache)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ldbm_search: candidate 15 does not match
>> filter
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 15
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 15 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: send_ldap_search_result 0::
>> 15:32:12 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: send_ldap_response: msgid=34 tag=101
>> err=0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 291: connection_get(272)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_get(272): got connid=0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_read(272): checking for input
>> on id=0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next: tag 0x30 len 54 contents:
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next on fd 272 failed
>> errno=10035 (WSAEWOULDBLOCK)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: do_search
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ber_scanf fmt ({aiiiib) ber:
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: SRCH "o=Spanlink Communications" 1
>> 015:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:     0 4000 0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ber_scanf fmt (o) ber:
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:     filter: (ou=*)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ber_scanf fmt ({v}}) ber:
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:     attrs:15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68:
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => ldbm_back_search
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: dn2entry_r: dn: "O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS"
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => dn2id( "O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_find_entry_dn2id("O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS"): 1 (1 tries)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= dn2id 1 (in cache)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => id2entry_r( 1 )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 1
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 1 )
>> "o=Spanlink Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= id2entry_r( 1 ) 0x62b160 (cache)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: search_candidates: base="O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS" s=1 d=0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => list_candidates 0xa0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => dn2idl( "O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => ldbm_cache_open( "dn2id.dbb", 9, 600 )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 0)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 1
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => list_candidates 0xa1
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => equality_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => ldbm_cache_open( "objectClass.dbb", 9,
>> 600 )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 3)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => key_read
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= index_read 0 candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= equality_candidates NULL
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= equality_candidates 0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => presence_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= presence_candidates: index_param
>> returned=18
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= list_candidates 16
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= list_candidates 1
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= filter_candidates 1
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 1
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 1 ): returned
>> (0)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => id2entry_r( 3 )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 3
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 3 ) "ou=Call
>> Center 1,o=Spanlink Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= id2entry_r( 3 ) 0x62b0c0 (cache)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: => send_search_entry: "ou=Call Center
>> 1,o=Spanlink Communications"
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: <= send_search_entry
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 68: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 3
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 3 ): returned
>> (0)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: send_ldap_search_result 0::
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 68: send_ldap_response: msgid=35 tag=101
>> err=0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 291: connection_get(272)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_get(272): got connid=0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: connection_read(272): checking for input
>> on id=0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next: tag 0x30 len 99 contents:
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 291: ber_get_next on fd 272 failed
>> errno=10035 (WSAEWOULDBLOCK)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: do_search
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ber_scanf fmt ({aiiiib) ber:
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: SRCH "ou=Agents,ou=Call Center
>> 1,o=Spanlink Communications" 1 015:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104:     0
>> 4000 0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ber_scanf fmt ({oo}) ber:
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104:     filter: (employeeNumber=\E5\A4)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ber_scanf fmt ({v}}) ber:
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104:     attrs:15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4
>> 104:
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => ldbm_back_search
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: dn2entry_r: dn: "OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL
>> CENTER 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS"
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => dn2id( "OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER
>> 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====>
>> cache_find_entry_dn2id("OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER 1,O=SPANLINK
>> COMMUNICATIONS"): 4 (1 tries)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= dn2id 4 (in cache)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 4 )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 4
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 4 )
>> "ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 4 ) 0x62da60 (cache)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: search_candidates:
>> base="OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" s=1 d=0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => list_candidates 0xa0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => dn2idl( "OU=AGENTS,OU=CALL CENTER
>> 1,O=SPANLINK COMMUNICATIONS" )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => ldbm_cache_open( "dn2id.dbb", 9, 600
>> )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 0)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 3
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => list_candidates 0xa1
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => equality_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => ldbm_cache_open( "objectClass.dbb",
>> 9, 600 )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= ldbm_cache_open (cache 3)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => key_read
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= index_read 0 candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= equality_candidates NULL
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= equality_candidates 0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 0
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => filter_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => equality_candidates
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= equality_candidates: index_param
>> returned=18
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= list_candidates 16
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 16
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= list_candidates 3
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= filter_candidates 3
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 4
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 4 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 13 )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 13
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 13 )
>> "employeeNumber=abc123,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink
>> Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 13 ) 0x630640 (cache)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ldbm_search: candidate 13 does not match
>> filter
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 13
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 13 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 14 )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 14
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 14 )
>> "employeeNumber=Ã¥Â¤Â©Ã¥...Â?Ã¨Â´Â¹Ã¨Â¯*,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink
>> Communications" (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 14 ) 0x6319e0 (cache)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ldbm_search: candidate 14 does not match
>> filter
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 14
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 14 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: => id2entry_r( 15 )
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_rtrylock: ID: 15
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_find_entry_id( 15 )
>> "employeeNumber=Ã¥Â¤,ou=Agents,ou=Call Center 1,o=Spanlink Communications"
>> (found) (1 tries)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: <= id2entry_r( 15 ) 0x632130 (cache)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ldbm_search: candidate 15 does not match
>> filter
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG4 104: entry_rdwr_runlock: ID: 15
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: ====> cache_return_entry_r( 15 ):
>> returned (0)
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: send_ldap_search_result 0::
>> 15:32:21 01/09/2002 DEBUG1 104: send_ldap_response: msgid=36 tag=101
>> err=0
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kurt D. Zeilenga [mailto:Kurt@OpenLDAP.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:53 PM
>> To: Alvin Wong
>> Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
>> Subject: Re: UTF-8 & internationalization
>>
>>
>> At 03:23 PM 2002-01-08, Alvin Wong wrote:
>> >OpenLDAP: 2.0.19
>> >OS: Windows NT
>> >Server: OpenLDAP 2.0.19 slapd
>> >Client: OpenLDAP 2.0.19 C API
>> >
>> >Hi All,
>> >
>> >I'm trying to setup an LDAP which has values in different languages,
>> >i.e. English, Chinese, French, etc. I encoded the values in UTF-8 and
>> am
>> >currently having some problems when I try to search for certain
>> entries.
>> >Specifically, I encoded Chinese characters in UTF-8 and when I have odd
>> >number of Chinese characters as the value, it fails while it succeeds
>> if
>> >it is even.
>>
>> That sounds odd.  You might try posting a sample LDIF so folks
>> can see what you are doing.
>>
>> >Another thing is that I did not encode the attribute names
>> >as they are in English.
>>
>> That's not a good idea.  Attribute names in the protocol are
>> restricted to a small subset of Unicode.
>>
>> >Am I doing this the wrong way?
>>
>> The right way would be for the application to map the
>> attribute names to something more meaningful.
>>
>> >Are there more
>> >stuff I should be looking at? Thanks in advance for any help.
>> >
>> >-Alvin
>>
References:
- RE: UTF-8 & internationalization
  - From: "Alvin Wong" <alvin.wong@spanlink.com>
- Re: UTF-8 & internationalization
  - From: "Huang Yuzhen" <huangyuzhen@bj.tom.com>
Prev by Date: Re: UTF-8 & internationalization
Next by Date: Re: UTF-8 & internationalization
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread