[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Openldap Testimonials ?

To: Philip_Brown <phil@bolthole.com>
Subject: Re: Openldap Testimonials ?
From: adam@morrison-ind.com
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:23:14 -0400
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <20010815115921.A8255@bolthole.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10108091435470.12646-100000@mailserver2.xpedite.com> <20010815115921.A8255@bolthole.com>
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs

>>Yes I agree this is all hardware dependant since openldap runs on 
>>pretty much any Unix but Netscape DS only runs on solaris. 
>>Can anyone related their experiences running openldap with greater 
>>then 20k or 30k entries? We are planning on using it for single sign 
>>on essentially.
>And, HOW exactly are you planning to do 'single signon' with it?
>Last time I looked around, a few months ago, LDAP does NOT let you
>authenticate users logging onto an M$windows box. You need kerberos for
>that. Has this changed?

http://sking.mesd.k12.or.us/

Samba 2.2.1a + LDAP support.  Handles WinY2k clients.  I don't know if it is
"single signon" but it certainly is "single password".

References:
- Openldap Testimonials ? (was Re: openldap performance numbers vs NS)
  - From: Michael Cunningham <archive@xpedite.com>
- Re: Openldap Testimonials ?
  - From: Philip_Brown <phil@bolthole.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Openldap Testimonials ?
Next by Date: Single Signon
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread