[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Openldap Testimonials ?

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: Openldap Testimonials ?
From: Philip_Brown <phil@bolthole.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:59:21 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10108091435470.12646-100000@mailserver2.xpedite.com>; from archive@xpedite.com on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 02:43:18PM -0400
References: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10108091435470.12646-100000@mailserver2.xpedite.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 02:43:18PM -0400, Michael Cunningham wrote:
> ...
> Yes I agree this is all hardware dependant since openldap runs on 
> pretty much any Unix but Netscape DS only runs on solaris. 
> 
> Can anyone related their experiences running openldap with greater 
> then 20k or 30k entries? We are planning on using it for single sign 
> on essentially.

And, HOW exactly are you planning to do 'single signon' with it?

Last time I looked around, a few months ago, LDAP does NOT let you
authenticate users logging onto an M$windows box. You need kerberos for that.
Has this changed?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Openldap Testimonials ?
  - From: adam@morrison-ind.com

References:
- Openldap Testimonials ? (was Re: openldap performance numbers vs NS)
  - From: Michael Cunningham <archive@xpedite.com>

Prev by Date: Re: SSL Question: Is Everyone Ignorant or Just Non-responsive
Next by Date: Re: Openldap Testimonials ?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread