[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: How sunstable is 2.07

To: Jakob <jsm@mailme.dk>
Subject: Re: How sunstable is 2.07
From: Pedro Melo <melo@isp.novis.pt>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 01:15:37 +0000
Cc: openldap list <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <01011200023000.00897@pc>; from jsm@mailme.dk on Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 12:02:30AM +0000
References: <01011200023000.00897@pc>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i

Hi!

2.0.7 has been more stable to me than 1.2.x series...

Best regards,

On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 12:02:30AM +0000, Jakob wrote:
> Hi there.
> 
> How unstable is 2.0.7, is it really just a development snap shot, or 
> something, and is it only 1.2.11 (or what ever) that is to recommend for real 
> use?

-- 
Pedro Melo Cunha - <melo@isp.novis.pt>
Novis - Dir. Rede - ISP - Infraes. Portal <http://www.novis.pt/>
Ed. Atrium Saldanha - Pça. Dq. Saldanha, 1 - 7º / 1050-094 Lisboa
tel:  +351 21 0104340  - Fax: +351 21 0104301

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How sunstable is 2.07
  - From: Vetle Roeim <vetle@opera.com>
- Re: How sunstable is 2.07
  - From: Cliff Friedel <cliff@wrkcs.net>

References:
- How sunstable is 2.07
  - From: Jakob <jsm@mailme.dk>

Prev by Date: How sunstable is 2.07
Next by Date: Re: Converting an Out Look addressbook to ldif
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread