Re: 1024 fd limit ?

[Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr>]

GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Sorry, I was looking at the wrong definition when I made my previous post.
> NR_OPEN is redefined in fs.h. So just issue the command 'ulimit -n 8192'
> and be happy with it.

Yes :)))

in fact i've posted the answer yesterday but the post has not reach the
list because I sent it by mistake to openldap-general ...

here is the post ...

>To: openldap-general@OpenLDAP.org, ydupont@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr
>Subject: Re: 1024 fd limit ?
>References: <3A12AF46.A0EDAA8B@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Yann Dupont wrote:
>>
>> the problem we have is that our 2 slaves hit more or less often the
>> 1024 open file descriptor limit. (we were quite suprised that any
>> client process use a distinctive socket to the LDAP server)
>> 
>> I understand that the 1024 fd limit per process
>> is probably due to the underlying OS/library
>> (in this case, linux with glibc 2.1)
>
>Well. I think I have the answer. It's quite silly, really
>
>ulimit -n 2048 before launching slapd seems to solve the problem...
>
>no recompilation needed ...
>
>Sorry for the last mails !
>
>Yann Dupont.


So here are the final words :)

Yann Dupont.