[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 1024 fd limit ?

To: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr>
Subject: Re: 1024 fd limit ?
From: GOMBAS Gabor <gombasg@inf.elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 22:53:36 +0100
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <3A13E048.E0A230F0@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr>; from Yann.Dupont@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr on Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 02:25:28PM +0100
References: <3A13A87D.8F9E95FB@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr> <20001116113429.D8191@morgan.alcove-int> <3A13BC5A.A54D58EC@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr> <20001116124509.A14548@valerie.inf.elte.hu> <3A13E048.E0A230F0@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr>

Hello,

Sorry, I was looking at the wrong definition when I made my previous post.
NR_OPEN is redefined in fs.h. So just issue the command 'ulimit -n 8192'
and be happy with it.

Gabor

-- 
Gabor Gombas                                       Eotvos Lorand University
E-mail: gombasg@inf.elte.hu                        Hungary

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 1024 fd limit ?
  - From: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr>

References:
- 1024 fd limit ?
  - From: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr>
- Re: 1024 fd limit ?
  - From: Luc Saillard <luc+openldapannounce@alcove.fr>
- Re: 1024 fd limit ?
  - From: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr>
- Re: 1024 fd limit ?
  - From: GOMBAS Gabor <gombasg@inf.elte.hu>
- Re: 1024 fd limit ?
  - From: Yann Dupont <Yann.Dupont@IPv6.univ-nantes.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: 1024 fd limit ?
Next by Date: RE: High Availability (was: Re: slave2master replication)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread