[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Performance issue with In-Memory BDB

To: "Suhel Momin" <suhelmomin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Performance issue with In-Memory BDB
From: "Gavin Henry" <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:19:28 +0100 (BST)
Cc: openldap-devel@openldap.org
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <7f1cc6540708310414u137066eco9c5ebc5682474b9f@mail.gmail.com>
Openpgp: id=796B1E87DB73BEA8
References: <7f1cc6540708310414u137066eco9c5ebc5682474b9f@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a-1.fc6

<quote who="Suhel Momin">
> Hi,
>
>     I have made changes such that backend BDB ( ver 4.5 ) resides in
> memory
> instead of on disk . This is with default slapd configuration.
> I was hoping to have a better performance with this. But what I now see is
> that do_add  takes much more time then what it use to take when BDB was
> on-Disk. Indexing is done on objectclass in both the cases.
>
> Any pointers on why this could be an issue?

This should be a openldap-software e-mail.

What are your changes?

DB_CONFIG settings?

Gavin.

References:
- Performance issue with In-Memory BDB
  - From: "Suhel Momin" <suhelmomin@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: dynamic group caching for member -> dynlist search - new implementor
Next by Date: Re: Performance issue with In-Memory BDB
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread