[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Performance issue with In-Memory BDB
Hi,
I have made changes such that backend BDB ( ver 4.5 ) resides in memory instead of on disk . This is with default slapd configuration.
I was hoping to have a better performance with this. But what I now see is that
do_add takes much more time then what it use to take when BDB was on-Disk. Indexing is done on objectclass in both the cases.
Any pointers on why this could be an issue?
Regards,
Suhel