Re: BerkeleyDB versions

[Kari Mattsson <kari@trivore.com>]

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On August 15, 2007 9:22:54 PM +0300 Kari Mattsson <kari@trivore.com> 
> wrote:
> > Simple, yet philosophical:
> >
> > If 'D' is the best companion for 'O', it is evolutionary to allow 'O+1'
> > to still work with 'D'.
> >
> > Requiring 'D+1' with 'O+1' makes upgrades more difficult to arrange as a
> > whole.
> >
> > So, maybe my point is change management.
>
> I think you also miss the point that every OpenLDAP minor release I've 
> experienced has required the database to be reloaded (2.1->2.2, 
> 2.2->2.3), so this again is no different than the past, although for 
> different reasons this time around, I believe.

You think right. My first OpenLDAP was during 2.1 era, and I wasn't 
really thinking this through.

> --Quanah

//Kari