Re: BerkeleyDB versions

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>]

--On August 15, 2007 9:22:54 PM +0300 Kari Mattsson <kari@trivore.com> 
wrote:
> Simple, yet philosophical:
>
> If 'D' is the best companion for 'O', it is evolutionary to allow 'O+1'
> to still work with 'D'.
>
> Requiring 'D+1' with 'O+1' makes upgrades more difficult to arrange as a
> whole.
>
> So, maybe my point is change management.

I think you also miss the point that every OpenLDAP minor release I've 
experienced has required the database to be reloaded (2.1->2.2, 2.2->2.3), 
so this again is no different than the past, although for different reasons 
this time around, I believe.

--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration