[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Alphabetised defines.sh?

To: "Hallvard B Furuseth" <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Subject: Re: Alphabetised defines.sh?
From: "Gavin Henry" <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 20:27:51 +0100 (BST)
Cc: openldap-devel@openldap.org
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <hbf.20070705d82x@bombur.uio.no>
References: <36013.212.159.59.85.1183648667.squirrel@webmail.suretecsystems.com> <hbf.20070705d82x@bombur.uio.no>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a-1.fc6

<quote who="Hallvard B Furuseth">
> Gavin Henry writes:
>> I've been trying to follow defines.sh to find a few variables. Is there
>> any reason the individual sections aren't alphabetised?
>
> Some variables cannot be sorted (e.g. DBDIR1 is set from DBDIR1A),
> and some variables are grouped logically within a section (e.g.
> P*SRSLAVECONF next to R*SRSLAVECONF), but for the most part I think
> it was originally to small for it to matter and then just grew.

One for later then ;-)

Gavin.

>
> --
> Regards,
> Hallvard
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alphabetised defines.sh?
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- Alphabetised defines.sh?
  - From: "Gavin Henry" <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>
- Re: Alphabetised defines.sh?
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

Prev by Date: Re: Alphabetised defines.sh?
Next by Date: Re: Alphabetised defines.sh?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread