Re: loglevel index intention?

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>]

----- "Howard Chu" <hyc@symas.com> wrote:
> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > I noticed that loglevel index is unused by anything currently, and I
> was
> > wondering what the intention was initially behind that loglevel. 
> There are
> > a number of back-bdb/hdb error messages that get generated around
> indices
> > that currently come out at the "any" level.  I thought perhaps index
> might
> > be better for them, but wasn't sure of the intent.
> 
> The practice has always been that real error messages are logged at
> ANY. The 
> finer grained levels are for informational messages.


Okay.  In the case I'm looking at, though, it isn't realy an error as there is no need for the attribute to actually be indexed, but it is still worthwhile to have in the filter. :/  I may just squelch it in the local build.

--Quanah