[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: loglevel index intention?

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: loglevel index intention?
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:12:39 -0700
Cc: openldap-devel@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <1DA9431C4368975F31D1851A@[192.168.1.3]>
References: <1DA9431C4368975F31D1851A@[192.168.1.3]>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.9a7pre) Gecko/2007070218 SeaMonkey/2.0a1pre

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

I noticed that loglevel index is unused by anything currently, and I was
wondering what the intention was initially behind that loglevel.  There are
a number of back-bdb/hdb error messages that get generated around indices
that currently come out at the "any" level.  I thought perhaps index might
be better for them, but wasn't sure of the intent.

The practice has always been that real error messages are logged at ANY. The finer grained levels are for informational messages.

--
  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: loglevel index intention?
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- loglevel index intention?
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: loglevel index intention?
Next by Date: Re: loglevel index intention?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread