[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: better malloc strategies
And another oops. The single-thread numbers for glibc in this post were
mis-copied (note they're identical to hoard's numbers). The multi-thread
numbers and the CPU times are all correct.
The actual single-thread stats for glibc in that test run were:
start 649
single 1281 01:02.25
single 1399 00:11.85
single 1404 01:43.01
single 1737 00:13.22
single 1748 00:12.80
single 1736 01:45.55
single 1764 00:12.79
single 1772 00:13.14
Still no idea why there are such erratic jumps in its behavior.
Howard Chu wrote:
> back-bdb numbers for HEAD as of today:
glibc hoard umem tcmalloc
size time size time size time size time
start 655 655 651 660
single 1703 00:20.50 1703 00:20.50 1696 00:22.24 1350 00:21.54
single 1708 00:11.79 1708 00:11.79 1720 00:12.26 1364 00:12.76
single 1715 00:12.86 1715 00:12.86 1743 00:13.61 1440 00:14.01
single 1729 00:12.98 1729 00:12.98 1743 00:13.07 1445 00:14.11
single 1729 00:12.91 1729 00:12.91 1743 00:13.05 1445 00:14.09
single 1746 00:12.93 1746 00:12.93 1743 00:13.08 1445 00:14.13
single 1747 00:12.92 1747 00:12.92 1743 00:13.06 1458 00:14.11
single 1747 00:12.92 1747 00:12.92 1743 00:13.06 1458 00:14.10
four 1814 00:41.54 1820 00:22.01 1791 00:22.97 1519 00:24.05
four 1858 00:44.89 1852 00:22.14 1791 00:22.43 1541 00:24.15
four 2035 00:33.69 1852 00:22.11 1791 00:22.36 1548 00:24.24
four 2060 00:33.89 1853 00:22.02 1791 00:22.35 1548 00:23.68
four 2075 00:33.67 1853 00:22.01 1791 00:22.30 1548 00:24.68
four 2066 00:35.08 1853 00:22.11 1799 00:22.33 1548 00:23.78
four 2056 00:32.59 1853 00:21.88 1815 00:22.24 1548 00:23.87
four 2055 00:41.03 1853 00:22.21 1815 00:22.11 1548 00:23.75
CPU1 06:16.19 01:49.00 01:54.14 01:59.01
CPU final 12:04.24 05:32.77 05:40.43 05:51.68
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc
OpenLDAP Core Team http://www.openldap.org/project/