Re: back-bdb deadlocks?

["David Boreham" <david_list@boreham.org>]

> re: writes - yes, it's outside the realm of interest here. Such a write 
> would be non-recoverable *if* the logfile containing it was removed 
> before it got committed and checkpointed. But that's the same fate as if 
> the entire environment had logging disabled. If you ask for it, you get 
> it... If you commit and checkpoint, then there's no problem either way.

Well of course the point of your patch was 
precisely that you did _not_ want to disable
recoverability for the entire environment or DB.
But since this isn't the BerkeleyDB mailing list, the 
continuing discussion is off topic. 
I'd be interested to hear what Keith
says about your proposed patch though.