Re: back-bdb deadlocks?

["Jong-Hyuk" <jongchoi@OpenLDAP.org>]

I tested this on two of my test Linux boxes (RH9 and 7.3) and the problem
seems to be solved now.
It'll be great if anybody confirms this on different Linux distros /
different OSes.
- Jong-Hyuk

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Chu" <hyc@symas.com>
To: "Jong-Hyuk" <jongchoi@OpenLDAP.org>
Cc: <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: back-bdb deadlocks?


> Jong-Hyuk wrote:
>
> > I could also produce a deadlock case in both a Redhat 7.3 uniprocessor
and a
> > Redhat 9 SMP box,
> > but I could get the full stack trace only in the Redhat 7.3 box. Weird
gdb
> > behavior in Redhat 9...
> >
> > Two files were uploaded to the incoming ftp directory:
> > ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/test008-backtrace.txt for stack trace
> > ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/test008-db_stat.txt for db_stat -CA
result
>
> I finally tracked down all the memory corruption issues and now it's
> working for me. Looks like I get to enjoy this weekend...
> -- 
>    -- Howard Chu
>    Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
>    http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
>    Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
>
>