[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: User-defined attribute options
- To: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: Re: User-defined attribute options
- From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 13:42:55 +0100
- In-reply-to: <HBF.20021130jz83@bombur.uio.no>
- References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021115084015.029957f0@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.0.20021113073029.035baf10@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.0.20021111085515.03ca3c48@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.0.20021110081814.03407f20@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.0.20021109064413.037fecb0@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.0.20021108194448.0380eec0@127.0.0.1> <34308.131.175.154.56.1036585256.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it> <E189OqY-0000Ib-00@urg.uio.no> <HBF.20021106f3pc@bombur.uio.no> <HBF.20021109hdqo@bombur.uio.no> <HBF.20021110qohx@bombur.uio.no> <HBF.20021111smrm@bombur.uio.no> <HBF.20021113s1zc@bombur.uio.no> <HBF.20021115g3b5@bombur.uio.no> <HBF.20021117w1ir@bombur.uio.no> <5.1.0.14.0.20021119002540.0361fe90@127.0.0.1> <HBF.20021130jz83@bombur.uio.no>
> Here is the next version of my patch for user-defined attribute options
> and ranges. Should I commit it?
> http://folk.uio.no/hbf/OpenLDAP/attr-options.txt
Note: I've now removed the test in is_ad_sublang() for whether a
supposed option range actually is declared as an option range. It was
superfluous: is_ad_sublang() is only called with values where this has
already been checked.
--
Hallvard