[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: New Debug
At 07:12 AM 2/7/01 -0500, Gary Williams wrote:
>Well, I'd say this is a question for Kurt. It looks to me like the new
>logging functions work, no one has complained about them, and I think
>they meet Kurt's requirements overall. I would have been happier if
>I had heard from more people that they tried it and liked it, or had
>reservations about it. Personally, I'm ready to make the new logging
>the default, unless someone has problems with it.
Flip the switch and let's see who complains.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pierangelo Masarati [mailto:masarati@aero.polimi.it]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 4:33 AM
>> To: gwilliams@OpenLDAP.org
>> Cc: OpenLDAP Devel
>> Subject: New Debug
>>
>>
>> Gary,
>>
>> maybe I missed something, but is there a schedule or
>> any plans for the new debug to supersede the current
>> one? Moreover, should contributions to OpenLDAP
>> use the new debug instead of the old one, or better
>> use both #ifdef'd as you're doing with your recent
>> commits to the repository?
>>
>> Pierangelo.
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Pierangelo Masarati | voice: +39 02 2399 8365
>> Dip. Ing. Aerospaziale | fax: +39 02 2399 8334
>> Politecnico di Milano | mailto:masarati@aero.polimi.it
>> via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy |
>> http://www.aero.polimi.it/~masarati
>>
>>
>>