RE: alias (was: Summary of [Models] issues from WG Last Call)

["Steven Legg" <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>]

Kurt,

Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> At 02:22 PM 2/10/2003, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> >6) aliases
> >   http://www.openldap.org/lists/ietf-ldapbis/200301/msg00075.html
> >
> >  Clarification was requested regarding whether naming attributes
> >  of an alias entry must be present in the alias entry and, if so,
> >  what schema mechanism allows them to be present.  The following
> >  clarification and example are to be added: 
> 
>         Every 'alias' object class must also belongs to object
>         classes which allow suitable naming attributes to be
>         present.

A more accurate wording would be:

	An entry with the 'alias' object class must also belong to
	an object class (or classes), or be governed by a content rule,
	which allows suitable naming attributes to be present.

Regards,
Steven