[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

alias (was: Summary of [Models] issues from WG Last Call)



At 02:22 PM 2/10/2003, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>6) aliases
>   http://www.openldap.org/lists/ietf-ldapbis/200301/msg00075.html
>
>  Clarification was requested regarding whether naming attributes
>  of an alias entry must be present in the alias entry and, if so,
>  what schema mechanism allows them to be present.  The following
>  clarification and example are to be added: 

        Every 'alias' object class must also belongs to object
        classes which allow suitable naming attributes to be
        present.  These object classes may be subclasses of
        'alias' or auxiliary classes (including 'extensibleObject').

        Example: 
        dn: cn=bar,dc=example,dc=com
        objectClass: top
        objectClass: alias
        objectClass: extensibleObject
        cn: bar
        aliasedObjectName: cn=foo,dc=example,dc=com

sorry, Kurt