[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-03.txt
At 05:25 AM 2002-11-22, Norbert Klasen wrote:
>- the rhs of list definitions was optional, which would allow an empty list (e.g. "NAME ()").
This form is not used and likely will cause problems in some parsers.
>- BTW: The current form of *list definitions allows a list to only contain one element. This allows both "NAME 'cn'" and "NAME ('cn')". Is this intended?
Yes.
I concur with the other changes suggested.
Kurt