[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: DN-alt issues
At 07:40 AM 2002-08-21, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>>I agree, but we could also agree on a new definition for the table. Our goal is clarity and interoperability, but we also do not want to retroactively label a lot of LDAP deployments as "non standard" if we do not have to.
>
>draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn causes, to the best of my knowledge, to
>become "non standard".
I meant:
draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn causes, to the best of my knowledge,
no existing implementation to become "non standard".